News from a World gone mad

yet there is still so much beauty


January 18, 2016

Deepcut barracks: rape, ‘pimping’ allegations emerge amid calls for inquiry into army recruit deaths

© Wikipedia

New allegations that recruits were raped and “pimped” out by officers have emerged as calls increase for a public inquiry into the army’s notorious Deepcut training camp.

The new allegations center on the culture of the Surrey facility where the shooting deaths of four army recruits took place between 1995 and 2002. They emerged during a new inquest into the case.

On Saturday, an investigation by The Independent newspaper raised questions about a culture of rape, abuse and exploitation at the camp. It emerged that up to 60 complaints were made to local police by recruits in 1995 alone.

Lawyers acting for the family of Private Cheryl James told a pre-inquest hearing that she may have been sexually exploited by high-ranking soldiers entrusted with her care and raped the night before the 18-year-old was found dead with gunshot wounds to the head.

Her father, Des James, raised his long-held concerns to The Independent, telling the paper: “I believe there was a serious problem with the culture in that camp.

I think there was a culture that breached regulations, a culture of drug use, alcohol bingeing, bullying and sexual intimidation. There was very little respect for individual recruits,” he said.

The James family fought the military for 20 years to get a second inquest. The original proceedings lasted just one hour and, it is claimed, ignored key evidence.

There is no evidence that was collected that could prove that the rifle that was found by the side of her was the rifle that killed her, and there was no evidence that, even if it was, she was the person who fired it,” James said.

© AparatMediaTV

We just want to know what happened to our daughter,” he added.

Around 100 witnesses are said to be coming forward to give evidence to the ongoing inquest, the proceedings of which have being published in detail by investigative journalist Barry Keevins.

Speaking on behalf of the James family, Alison Foster QC said: “These are witnesses who were there at the time, who are complaining of sexual events being organized by others which Cheryl James was part of.

There are unanswered questions remaining that Cheryl may have been sexually coerced or raped the night before her death. The new evidence gives a sinister new slant over the issue of sexual coercion.

There is now a direct allegation that she was ordered to sleep with Witness A by someone higher up, who we are calling Witness B.

Foster said another witness, herself a former recruit, claimed that people were brought to watch James being raped.

Foster likened the culture at the camp to one of “pimping and prostitution.

This is not fraternizing. This is not an illicit sexual relationship between two young people across the ranks.

This is something quite different,” Foster added.

On Sunday it was reported that a number of male recruits have also claimed they had been raped at the camp in the early 1990s.

An anonymous former counsellor from the region told the Independent that two men had told him they had made complaints.

They had talked to the military police and had been told if you go on like this you will be court-martialled or thrown out,” he said.

They made formal complaints [to Surrey Police] and then at some stage it was decided that no action was going to be taken,” he added.

 source RT







Oxfam says wealth of richest 1% equal to other 99%

Luxury yacht in Nice

The richest 1% now has as much wealth as the rest of the world combined, according to Oxfam.

It uses data from Credit Suisse from October for the report, which urges leaders meeting in Davos this week to take action on inequality.

Oxfam also calculated that the richest 62 people in the world had as much wealth as the poorest half of the global population.

It criticised the work of lobbyists and the amount of money kept in tax havens.

Oxfam predicted that the 1% would overtake the rest of the world this time last year.

It takes cash and assets worth $68,800 (£48,300) to get into the top 10%, and $760,000 (£533,000) to be in the 1%. That means that if you own an average house in London without a mortgage, you are probably in the 1%.

The figures carry various caveats, for example, information about the wealth of the super-rich is hard to come by, which Credit Suisse says means its estimates of the proportion of wealth held by the 10% and the 1% is “likely to err on the low side”.

As a global report, the figures also necessarily include some estimates of levels of wealth in countries from which accurate statistics are not available.


Some free market think tanks questioned the credibility of the figures.

The Institute of Economic Affairs’ director general Mark Littlewood said the statistics were “bogus”.

“The methodology of adding up assets and subtracting debts and then making a global ‘net wealth’ distribution implies that many of the poorest in the world are those in advanced countries with high debts. Whilst we might have sympathy for the Harvard law graduate’s plight, it is unclear that worrying about her should be the focus of a development organisation,” he said.

The Adam Smith Institute’s head of research Ben Southwood also said the data was “misleading”.

“More meaningful measures show greater equality. Those in the middle and bottom of the world income distribution have all got pay rises of around 40% between 1988-2008. Global inequality of life expectancy and height are narrowing too—showing better nutrition and better healthcare where it matters most.

“What we should care about is the welfare of the poor, not the wealth of the rich,” he added.

Oxfam said that the 62 richest people having as much wealth as the poorest 50% of the population is a remarkable concentration of wealth, given that it would have taken 388 individuals to have the same wealth as the bottom 50% in 2010.

full article at BBC NEWS

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: